Douglas Kearney
CREDIBLE
The Panel acknowledges the Respondent and his penis.
The Panel notes the Respondent and his penis are normal.
The Panel notes the Respondent’s penis is normal at length.
During Panel interviews, the Panel repeatedly expressed agreement with the Respondent’s penis.
The Panel found the Respondent and his penis to be well-spoken and verbally skilled.
The Panel found the Respondent’s penis to be engaging.
The Panel found the Panel believes the Respondent and his penis.
In addition, the Panel notes the Respondent and his penis not in violation.
The Panel believes the Respondent’s penis is not obligated.
The Panel does not believe this is not the first grey-area sexual interaction the Respondent and his penis have had.
The Panel believes that Complainant was in control of the Respondent’s penis, in fact.
In fact, the Panel believes the Respondent’s penis to be under threat.
The Panel concludes the Respondent and his penis’ version of the events to be more credible.
The Panel does not believe it demonstrated efforts to support, nurture the Respondent’s penis.
The Panel found the Respondent’ and his penis were consistent with past sexual practices and history.
Accordingly, the Panel was consistent with past sexual practices and history.
Therein
is
the
threat.